Media Circus

Numbers are Important, but Crazed
Egos and Rivalries are Fun
!
Boy, there's nothing the media industry loves more than writing about the
media industry. I've covered that beat since early 2007 at Bloomberg, initially
with a focus on new media, but as I stay on it I've been pulled more and more
into the world of the traditional companies, and now I can cover them in all
their low-growth splendor too. They are fun: There's nothing like a dual-
voting structure like the ones that dominate this business to assure that some
seriously strange people gain and keep power.

I mean, when it's Sumner v. Tom, who do you root for?

Most of these clips also appear under the Deals and Dealmakers tab, if
you've been there already.

Barry Diller. Like much of Wall Street, I was a Barry Diller bull in 2003, when
he put together $9 billion of deals to create IAC/InterActiveCorp. So I called
him
The Web Mogul in this cover. By 2004, I was turning up the heat. By
2005,
I exposed the division between IAC and Expedia, Diller's biggest-ever
deal, in this piece. In 2007, Diller moved to break up his remaining empire.

John Malone. This one won an internal award at Bloomberg because it was,
as our New York bureau chief said, the first story about Malone's crazily
complex empire he had ever understood. It also broke news of Malone's rift
with Diller over Expedia, which led to a 20% jump in Expedia stock within a
month of this May 2007 story. Also, for all the Street's skepticism at the time,
our analysis of how DirecTV is doing against cable companies is looking
better and better. DirecTV rose 18% over the next five months, while cable
stocks fell 20%, as DTV picked up market share. The annoying part: Because
I don't get to do personality journalism at Bloomberg, my January 2007 pitch
to make this story about the division between Diller and Greg Maffei, a former
Expedia chairman Malone had hired to run Liberty Media, was left for the
Journal to do (and to do brilliantly, and on page one) nine months later. We
did the numbers, and did them well, because that's what we do. But the
numbers weren't the real story.

Sam Zell and Tribune. I did two stories about Zell's $14-billion-of-other-
people's money deal to buy Tribune in the summer of 2007. The first was
followed by the NYT, BusinessWeek and other wire services, and was about
how the deal was likely to collapse around 2010 because Tribune was
blowing the financial projections the deal was based on. In the second piece, I
explained how to make money off the chaos,
since the deal’s structure meant
Zell’s financial incentives were still to go ahead and close the buy, even
though the market was betting he wouldn't. If you followed my fairly explicit
advice to buy  Tribune stock, you made an annualized return of more than
100%. Shares hit a 52-week low the day this story appeared and then moved
up 50% in four months, exactly as we predicted.

Mario Gabelli, the Dolans and Cablevision. I came onto the Cablevision
story late, but began breaking the scoops as soon as I did. I broke four
stories in a month as the $22 billion deal moved toward defeat, and
did the
definitive numbers story on why the LBO went down and why Cablevision is
worth much more than the market thinks. The market thinks this story is
wrong, judging from the stock price, but it's early yet.

Bottom line: The day shareholders voted on this deal, the NY Post said it
would pass, the WSJ said it was too close to call, the NYT did no story and
Bloomberg said it was dead. One for four.

McClatchy, Real Estate Ads and the Net. You had to see the look on this
CEO's face when I asked if he had really
dumped hisTwin Cities papers
because he knew when he sold them that Minnesota's biggest realtor was
pulling 75 percent of its advertising. Well, uh, we'd heard some things, he
stammered. Good times. Romemesko linked to this story, and the Infectious
Greed blog called it "harrowing reading.''
Under Construction